Capital Musings

Politics, Business, and Innovation

Category: Politics (page 1 of 8)

The tail risk of climate volatility

Barry Ritholtz was commentating over at Bloomberg View on climate change, with the initial stimulus being Hank Paulson’s article in The New York Times about “The Coming Climate Crash”. I have actually been thinking about climate volatility for some time now because it is one of the fundamental factors that drives not just our politics, but also our economy.

The History of Climate Volatility

Back in early 2011, at the dawn of the Arab Spring, one of the grievances was the intense inflation in food: whether you refer to the UBS Bloomberg Index, S&P GSCI, or Rogers Index, in the span of September to February, food prices had more or less risen 30%. In the developed world, where food is a relatively low portion of our budget, it causes a minor inconvenience. But in the developing world, where food consumes a larger portion of the household budget, it can be a principal cause of revolution.

I saw parallels with the Arab Spring and the historical revolutions across Europe in 1848, starting in Paris and rapidly spreading throughout the Germany and the Hapsburg Empire. One of the chief grievances in those instances was food pricing as well. The most ancient of supply shocks—famine—can be severe enough to cause whole societies to migrate. Two relatively modern instances are the Irish migration to the United States in wake of the 19th century potato famine and the Oklahoman migration to California during the 20th century dust bowl.

Indeed, there were unique forces in 2011 that were causing 30% food inflation in a span of only several months. Central Banks across the world had been cutting rates and experimenting with quantitative easing. An attempt to jumpstart biofuels also created a bit of a run on grains. But there were also supply constaints caused by some remarkable weather events.

In 2010, drought and fires had destroyed a quarter of Russia’s grain area and floods had affected half a million tons of wheat in Pakistan. The fires in Russia were so bad that you could see them from space. Australia had floods of Biblical proportion, with most of the province of Queensland being submerged and rainfall records being set, exceeding one metre at some weather stations. Perhaps an apt metaphor for 2010–2011 was that a “perfect storm” created an agricultural supply shock that contributed to the catalysis of simmering populist outrage.

Russian wildfires in 2010 captured from NASA’s Aqua satellite. Image width is approximately 900 km.

Russian wildfires in 2010 captured from NASA’s Aqua satellite. Image width is approximately 900 km.

Thinking of it as a Straddle

How have agricultural prices performed since that time? Over the long term, prices haven’t consistently gone up-and-to-the-right. In fact, according to International Grains Council, we have been able to keep ramping up production to meet demand. If you pull up the DJ-UBS Commodity Subindices on your Bloomberg or Thomson, there was a doubling of grain prices in the ’07–’08 time period, most of which receded. The rise in 2010 and the spike in 2011 were merely transitory. The magnitude of grain price rises haven’t been on the scale of, say, precious metals. And livestock is, surprisingly, priced less in 2014 than in 2004. Therefore, a good way to think about a climate-based investment thesis as expressed through commodities is that it behaves mainly like a volatile asset.

This is also what the payoff ratio of something like flood insurance essentially looks like as well. If a tail event like a hurricane occurs and damages your property, you receive a payout based off your insurance premium, with the premium equivalent in function to an option price.

In the Spring 2010 issue of Intelligent Life, an article called “What’s happened to the seasons?” profiles the impact of climate volatility on societies extremely reliant on agricultural yields. In Balaka, Malawi, unpredictable rains result in wilted maize. In Vietnam, cold snaps and floods destroy entire harvests. And in Kashmir, a traditional season called the tsonth has not happened for ten years.

How can these people come with greater unpredictability? Modern futures markets are actually descended from efforts by farmers to hedge harvest risk. It may be time to bring things full circle. While the most basic forms of financial services have been brought to the developing world in the form of microlending, more sophisticated financial products such as insurance and futures do not seem to have achieved the same level of success. Or at least, not visible success; I am not aware of large scale microinsurance ventures on the scale of Grameen or Kiva.

While the introduction of savings accounts would help smooth the volatility of incomes in non-agricultural sectors, farmers and ranchers will need financial products tailored to their needs. If the administrative costs can be brought down to a micro level, the farmers in Malawi would pay a small premium and receive a payout if rains destroy their maize. It’s the same principle behind the strategies used by a Cargill—the difference is that the opportunity is brought to those far more vulnerable.

Geopolitical Implications

The greatest irony, however, can be found in societies like Greenland. While climate volatility brings an end to traditional ways of life, it can open new vocations in certain countries.

Prior to assuming office, Aleqa Hammond the Prime Minister of Greenland, noted the following irony:

“If we are standing there, feeling sorry for ourselves, we can’t gain anything. So, we have to think: what does [climate change] bring? Some places will lose everything, and I feel very bad for them, but we are not in that position. The retreating of the ice gives Greenlanders a greater survey of what the country contains—the riches. We know that there is oil in Greenland. You can touch it, you can feel it…Now there are companies around the world showing interest in it.”

Intelligent Life, Winter 2009

The melting of the ice in Greenland actually makes it easier for oil exploration and production. But Greenland would not be the only beneficiary of the increase in climate volatility. Vladimir Putin was once quoted, “For a northern country like Russia, it won’t be that bad if it gets two or three degrees warmer,” since “we would spend less on fur coats” and “our grain production would increase.” This comes from the leader whose graduate school thesis was Mineral And Raw Materials Resources And The Development Strategy For The Russian Economy.

Although Paulson’s editorial was about a coming climate crash, there are indications that changes—whether you or not you believe it is anthropogenic—have already been well underway. The decrease in Arctic ice has finally made it a viable shipping route. Scott G. Borgerson has been sounding the bell for some time now, presciently in the March/April 2008 issue of Foreign Affairs in an essay called “Arctic Meltdown”. More recently, Borgerson published “The Coming Arctic Boom” in the July/August 2013 issue of Foreign Affairs.

The main theme of those pieces is the following: as the Arctic opens up, it provides both dangers and opportunities. Dangers in terms of a potential for a 21st century scramble for maritime territory. And opportunities in terms of cutting the shipping times between northern cities. While Prime Minister Hammond’s commentary was about turning Greenland into an Emirati-like petro state, energy is just one industry that can be empowered by these changes. Arctic nations can also use the receding of the ice to become a shipping and trading hubs, much in the same vein as Suez or Panama.


There are other risk factors unmentioned thus far. Intertwined with climate volatility is water: Lake Mead’s bathtub ring, water wars between American states, or the receding of the Aral Sea. These have other dimensions to them as well in terms of increased irrigation needs, population growth, and migration.

Whatever your political position, climate volatility is a real issue that will be consequential in human affairs. And whether or not it gets to the point where we intentionally cross the controversial geoengineering threshold, we are going to need to adapt to the uncertainties that lie upon the road ahead.

Entrepreneurs thinking twice about doing business in France

This morning, French President François Hollande declared that the GE offer for Alstom was “unacceptable”. While the need for state review due to the nuclear technology is understandable, extraordinary scrutiny regarding the rest of the deal—which seems to be the point of contention—is one more data point that feeds a larger narrative of the French government’s inhospitable attitude towards the business sector.

Along with Hollande’s 75% millionaire tax proposal—which was incidentally ruled unconstitutional—particularly worrying is the current Economy Minister Arnaud Montebourg’s history of calls for nationalization of assets of private companies.

But this inhospitableness does not stop at protection of old assets. There has been outright opposition to new companies. When Uber entered the French market, it wasn’t long until there were cases of vandalism against the new entrant.

Historical, political, and cultural opposition against business sector in France has led quite a few entrepreneurs to decamp for more business-friendly countries. The New York Times recently had a piece about entrepreneur flight to the United Kingdom. That Times article further cited Le Monde’s discussion on whether youth must leave France to succeed.

The Centre for Policy Studies recently released a paper that compared the propensity of a country to generate “SuperEntrepreneurs”. That is, not looking merely at the self-employment statistics, which could include your corner barber or your accountant. Rather, it looked at countries that had a large number of entrepreneurs building multibillion dollar global companies. In other words, those entrepreneurs who create most of the new jobs.

When they compared incidence of high-impact entrepreneurship they found, “The lowest share is found amongst nations with French legal origins, which is less than one-fifth of that of nations with English legal origins.”

When the stability of the rule of law has become uncertain due to the its co-optation by the political process, then executives think twice about doing business in that environment. That is, why go to France, when you can just go next door to Germany or across the Channel to England?

More developments in sabre rattling

Earlier today (overnight Eastern time), Crimean MPs voted to join Russia. Western foreign ministers have said they will not recognize it. A few hours ago, a US Navy Destroyer went through the Bosphorous into the Black Sea. In the past hour, a the Turkish Air Force scrambled F-16s to intercept a Russian surveillance plane. U.S. military assets are going to Lithuania & Poland as well.

Crimean Crisis Coverage

Conflict Coverage
In Country News Outlets
Vladimir Putin Background

Debate at Davos: Does Austerity Work?

Davos 2012: live

He added Germany is “dictating” austerity for the euro area that needs to be offset with an economic stimulus as a “second phase.” 11:55 Speaking from Davos, Mark Spelman, managing director, strategy at Accenture shares insights from a new … Read More

Bankers at Davos gird for more austere times

Leaders of the world’s biggest banks touted the virtues of austerity at the World Economic Forum in Davos — for themselves, not just for over-indebted governments. Many arrived in the Swiss Alps following a year marked by weak revenue … Read More

Davos rolling blog: day 3

Financier George Soros led the way with a warning that German austerity could push Europe into a deflationary … his proposals to overhaul Britain’s financial regulation in Davos. This from the FT’s economics correspondent Norma Cohen … Read More

DAVOS: Europe’s Austerity Message Kills Risk-Taking – Shiller

DAVOS, Switzerland (Dow Jones)–Yale University economist Robert Shiller has a message for German Chancellor Angela Merkel: You are telling the wrong story. Shiller, whose influential pre-financial crisis book “Animal Spirits” explored the … Read More

‘Austerity Disease’ Continues to Infect Europe, Fuel Popular Protest

Back in Davos, where the World Economic Forum is wrapping up its weeklong gathering, critics of austerity continued to press their case. As the Huffington Post reports: Joseph E. Stiglitz, Professor, Columbia University, of the U.S., attends a … Read More

European Leaders Stress The Positive At Davos

DAVOS, Switzerland (AP) — European financial chiefs are trying to soothe global CEOs and political leaders, insisting they have a handle on the eurozone’s troubles. Germany’s Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble says he’s “quite optimistic … Read More

Davos leaders: Latin America can survive recession

DAVOS, Switzerland — When the developed world sneezes, the old saying goes, Latin America catches a cold. But now, after decades of austerity and reforms, the region’s leaders say their immune systems are in pretty good shape. Latin American … Read More

Citing Europe’s Progress, Merkel Urges Patience

DAVOS, Switzerland — Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany … as she toned down her usual calls for budgetary austerity. “We are not going to resolve this with the wave of a magic wand,” Mrs. Merkel told an audience at the World Economic … Read More

Austerity ‘Does Not Deliver’: HSBC Chief Economist

Austerity alone does not deliver the rewards it is meant to and the threats of stunted economic growth and recession remain high in the euro zone, Stephen King, global chief economist at HSBC told CNBC. Speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos … Read More

Leaders: Public needs to back austerity

DAVOS, Switzerland (AP) — Cash-strapped governments in Europe must persuade skeptical citizens to accept severe austerity measures if their countries are to recover and thrive in an increasingly tough global economic environment, European … Read More

Photo of Davos. Credit: flickr/World Economic Forum

Older posts